"...And do black lives still matter? Or are we now supposed to dump that and concentrate on the 'Not all men but most men and we don't know which men so we have to fear all men and we'd better not say the actual words but that includes black men' campaign?"

Judging someone's character and motivations is sometimes more a matter of what you don't see than what you do. Ideological influencers claim to stand for the disadvantaged, but I've discovered a quick way to get a sense of whether they're really there to do that, or merely to use the concept of victimhood for personal gain.
The method entails searching for two keywords, relating to groups that have a very high incidence of disadvantage, and so should, theoretically, figure in the campaigning of someone who claims to be fighting disadvantage. The two keywords are: